It took me 24 hours to write about the Costa Concordia’s disastrous cruise from Rome which resulted in five deaths and the latest estimate of 17 missing passengers because I’ve been covering the cruise industry for almost two decades. I know that Carnival Corporation, which owns Costa Cruises, is a leader in terms of building vessels that meet the highest safety specifications. (Photo: Solaro/AFP/Getty Images)
It was astonishing to see photos of a five year old 115,000 -ton cruise ship lying on its side roughly 600 feet from shore, hearing the harrowing tales of passengers swimming to shore, the utter pandemonium and panic of abandoning a dark listing ship. Not only is it the 100th anniversary of the sinking of Titanic but some of the details are scarily similar: a 160-foot gash in the ship’s hull that looks like someone tried to open it with a can opener coupled with people jumping in the water, the crew unable to launch many of the ship’s lifeboats and utter panic.
I attended this ship’s splashy Italian christening in 2006, toured half-built ships in dozens of visits to European shipyard, spent a great deal of time over the years interviewing ship builders and cruise line execs about cruise ship safety. I’ve written that the only threat to a modern cruise ship is fire.
So, how could this happen to cruise ship in the 21st century?
(Update: Costa Cruises publicly blames Captain Schettino saying he made “unapproved, unauthorized maneuver” to divert from its programmed course.)
The answer is that we won’t know for sure until Costa Concordia’s little black box reveals moment-by-moment sequence of events that resulted in the 4,000-passenger vessel crashing on rocks of Isola del Giglio on the Italian Riviera. At present the ship’s master, Captain Francesco Schettino, has been arrested, charged with multiple manslaughter, causing a shipwreck and abandoning ship. In an interview, the visibly distraught Captain said the “rocks not detected” on the navigational chart. Three people trapped inside the ship have been rescued as the search for 17 missing people continues.
Shipbuilding, even in this advanced age, remains an imperfect science and proves that even with the most advanced technology, things can and will go wrong. We also know that no amount of planning, drilling, detailed evacuation studies and preparation can predict how people will react during a disaster when facing their own mortality.
The Details
On January 13, Costa Concordia had set sail from Civitavecchia (port of Rome) on a seven day cruise at 4:00 p.m. with scheduled port calls in Savonna, Marseille, Barcelona, Palma de Mallorca, Cagliari and Palermo. Seas were calm and the Italian officers certainly knew this itinerary well since Concordia sails on this fixed itinerary each week. On board the vessels were 3200 passengers and a crew of 1000. International maritime laws stipulate that a mandatory lifeboat drill must take place within 24 hours of departing the port of embarkation and, as is quite common in this industry, Concordia’s was scheduled the following morning.
Shortly before 10:00 p.m. there was a sudden “boom and crash” followed by loss of electricity as water began spilling into the ship. Costa Concordia immediately started to list and passengers in the main dining room report that dishes and glasses crashed to the floor. An announcement from the bridge told passengers not to panic, that everything was under control.
But passengers and crew did panic There are reports of people being shoved down stairways as people raced to their staterooms to don life jackets. After 45 minutes the order to abandon ship created more chaos since passengers didn’t know where to go. In an interview one passenger said he was unable to board a lifeboat and swam to shore while a video taken on board a lifeboat illustrates how terrified its passengers were. Because the ship was listing many lifeboats couldn’t be launched.
While it may be true that the only real threat to a cruise ship is fire, there are clearly two other factors which can turn a cruise into a disaster: technical problems and human error. An example of the first is Carnival Splendor, which lost power in 2010 off the coast of Mexico. While the ship sat in the ocean for days there was nothing remotely frightening or dangerous about the experience. As for human error, we’ve seen that since the first human went to sea.
Again, nobody knows what caused this terrible accident. But several maritime experts interviewed about Costa Concordia expressed the a concern — ships carrying thousands of people have become too large to evacuate everyone safely.We must also remember that despite all of the reported panic and chaos, many, if not most of the ship’s crew did act valiantly and more than 4,000 people’s lives were saved.
While there has been an abundance of speculation, armchair quarterbacking and tabloid sensationalism, three things remain certain:
1) This was most certainly a preventable disaster
2) It will be some time before we know all the facts and circumstances surrounding it
3) The cruise industry is already busy examining and re-examining every facet of its safety planning, procedures and protocols
For further information……….
BBC has the most comprehensive information and video interviews.
I was very dismayed to read that ships in Costa Cruises (headquartered in Rome) fleet have had a larger than normal number of mishaps. See the report in the Daily Mirror (UK)
15 January
Cruise Deals
Cruise 1st offer a range of cruise deals all over the world.
Find cruises to suit your tastes and destinations at expedia.com

9 Comments Costa Concordia: How Could This Happen to a Modern Cruise Ship?
Zach
January 17th, 2012 at 9:16 am
1I read your post on the Huffington Post and felt I owe you a response.
The big question is this: had that “guilty” captain performed that maneuver before? I bet he’d done in many times, and I’m sure he wasn’t the only one.
As an Alaska who has followed the cruise ships coming to my hometowns for nearly 30 years, I can tell you that there’s still a long way to go before I would consider cruise ships fully safe.
Talk to a crew member onshore and promise them anonymity. Conditions for crew are crazy.
Talk to local fisherman who have nearly been hit by these ships.
I myself was towing a long raft of logs less than a mile from my home in Sitka, Alaska when the Seven Seas Mariner headed straight for me at about 15 knots. I was going 3 knots. It was a bright sunny day, and this large ship passed between me and a charted reef…going less than 100 yards from this reef. I took evasive action and pulled my boat and logs away from the ships’ path. I came less than 100 feet from hitting the ship. They should have seen me from at least two miles away.
This story is so common with Alaskan fisherman…just ask. I’ve heard dozen of stories of cruiseships heading straight for them both in broad daylight and in the dark
Ask another hard question:
Why are the majority of these ships registered in countries with little safety requirements?
Answer: to save money.
The sad fact is that most of the cruise ships out there could not come even remotely close to complying with US Coast Guard safety requirements.
I am all for a responsible cruise ship industry, one that ensures the safety of the own passengers and crew.
Anne Campbell
January 17th, 2012 at 10:21 am
2What this disaster tells me is that you can’t predict human behavior, not the Captain, not the breakdown in the chain of command and not the crew panicking. When I worked at Cunard a long long time ago, one of our Captains ran a ship into the coral reef of Bermuda. He thought he’d give the passengers a better view. And while extensive crew training
On the contrary, all passenger ship that call in the United States must undergo U.S. Coast Guard inspection, where all safety and food handling gets a thorough review. The Coast Guard doesn’t tell you when it’s coming aboard. In five years two ships — Queen Mary 2 and, recently a Royal Caribbean vessel got scores below 86, which is passing for violations in the kitchen. Here’s a link to this information. While cruise ships are being built U.S. customs officials are consulted at every step because no ship can enter a U.S. port if they don’t pass muster.
Regarding your experience, it sounds terrifying and I hope you have reported it to the U.S. Coast Guard and/or local officials. Again, human behavior can’t be predicted.
Anne Campbell
January 17th, 2012 at 10:25 am
3Regarding foreign flag registry, or flags of convenience, this doesn’t have any bearing on safety … again, ships are regulated by the U.S. coast guard.
Murray Lundberg
January 17th, 2012 at 11:54 am
4I’d you have really “been covering the cruise industry for almost two decades”, you wouldn’t make such stupid statements as the ship having a 950-foot gash in the hull. The ship is 951.4 feet long.
Anne Campbell
January 17th, 2012 at 12:31 pm
5Murray …. thank you for catching a very embarrassing typo.
Sam Mutch
January 18th, 2012 at 1:43 pm
6The transcript of the telephone conversation between an infuriated Italian Coast Guard officer and Costa Concordia’s Captain Francesco Schettinohad who had left the ship was out of this world.
Anyone who has stood watch on a naval ship would be surprised how few watch-standers are on the bridge of a cruise ship.
When a ship the size of Concordia is in close waters as it was when the ship foundered, there should have many watch-standers on the bridge taking fixes on navigational aides and landmarks to ensure exactly where the ship is located.
Clearly, Costa, like all cruise lines I have observed, keeps a minimal watch on the bridge, at the most an officer, a helmsman(?) and possibly a messenger. No one is taking fixes. The watch officer is looking at GPS fixes, but what happens if the fix is off by 20 meters in tight waters in which the ship was navigating. Was the warning system functioning or disabled to permit the ship to approach the rocks and islands that were so close.
What a shame for the Italian Merchant Marine. Was Captain Francesco Schettinohad impaired or just a coward?
Geoff Edwards
January 19th, 2012 at 12:42 pm
7I was on the Royal Viking Sun. We hit a reef of Egypt. Opposite to Concordia, Our Captain sent us to Lifeboat Stations with in two minutes of the crash.
Had Schettino not waited the ship would have been close to empty in the close to an hour it took for “Abandon Ship” to be initiated.
A bit ago I chatted with an instructor of ship Pilots, and he said the most difficult task was to get them to look out the window. When we crashed the reefs were highly visible; the most Junior officer was on the bridge. he did not look out the window.
I have the story of my crash in an E book entitled “Going All The Way”; a frank look at two world cruises.
Oh, and Schettino’s job before making Captain…..wait for this…Safety Officer
Anne Campbell
January 19th, 2012 at 1:06 pm
8Geoff………Oh, I remember when that happened. Believe my good friend Anne Kalosh was aboard at that time. Royal Viking Line was superb! In all ways it was the very best. Royal Viking Cruises is run by the same people … they’re building two ships which should be wonderful.
Nick
January 24th, 2012 at 7:34 am
9“When we crashed the reefs were highly visible; the most Junior officer was on the bridge. he did not look out the window” – I was the Radio Officer on Royal Viking Sun that night and was first on to the bridge after the ship struck the reef and I felt compelled to point out that ‘not looking out of the window’ had nothing at all to do with the cause of that accident.
RSS feed for comments on this post · TrackBack URI
Leave a Reply